Fiscal Cliff Deal Brings Changes to Estate Taxes and IRAs

'Fiscal Cliff' Deal Brings Changes to Estate Taxes and IRAs

Congress finally came to an agreement to avoid the "fiscal cliff," and the agreement includes some changes to federal estate taxes and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). The American Taxpayer Relief Act sets a permanent estate tax rate and provides a tax break for cash donated to charities from an IRA.

The new law makes only minor changes to the federal estate tax. The amount that you can transfer tax-free either during life or at death will remain the same as it has the past two years. The law permanently sets the estate tax exemption at $5 million for an individual (now $5.12 million due to inflation) and $10 million for a couple (now $10.24 million).  (With new inflation adjustments, the exemptions are estimated to rise to about $5.2 million and $10.4 million.)  The lifetime gift tax exclusion – the amount you can give away without incurring a tax – also remains the same at $5.12 million.  But you can still give any number of other people $14,000 each per year without the gifts counting against the lifetime limit.

Under the new law, the gift and estate tax rate will increase from 35 percent to 40 percent. This means that if you transfer more than $5.12 million either during your life or upon your death, your estate will be taxed at 40 percent. The new law also makes permanent the "portability" provision currently in place. This allows a surviving spouse to add the unused portion of a deceased spouse's exclusion to his or her own. Note that portability is not automatic -- the estate must file an estate tax form when the first spouse dies even if no tax is owed.

The new estate tax rates and rules are “permanent,” but only until Congress decides to revisit them and the President agrees to the changes.  But keep in mind that the new law does not address state estate taxes, which many states have.

The fiscal cliff deal also brings back a tax provision called the IRA charitable rollover that had expired in 2011. The law extends the provision through 2013. This allows investors aged 70 ½ or older to transfer as much as $100,000 a year from an IRA directly to a charity without counting it as taxable income. Non-Roth IRA owners are required to take yearly minimum distributions from their IRAs starting at age 70 1/2, and the charitable donation can count toward the taxpayer's minimum required distribution for the year.


------------------------------------------

The Law Offices of Jeremy W. Howe, LTD. are ElderLaw attorneys in Rhode Island who specialize in wills and trusts, estate planning, guardianship, probate, and Veterans Aid and Attendance Benefits.

They also are Newport Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers, Attorneys, Mediators, and Arbitrators providing services for family law issues such as divorce, child custody and visitation, support, and military family law.

Call them today at 401-841-5700 or visit them on the web at http://www.CounselFirst.com.

Preparing Financially for Loss

A Shocking Death, a Financial Lesson and Help for Others

By RON LIEBER

In the days after Chanel Reynolds’s husband was hit while riding his bicycle near Lake Washington here and the best-case possibilities just kept getting worse, she was not yet consumed by grief. There were no dogged middle-of-the-night Web searches for faraway cures for his crushed upper spine or tearful bedside vigils with their 5-year-old son.

Instead, the buzz in her brain came from a growing list of financial tasks that grown-ups are supposed to have finished by the time they approach middle age. And she and her husband, José Hernando, had not finished them.

“I was finding it really hard for me to stay present and in the room and to be able to hear what the doctors were saying because I was so overwhelmed with not knowing how much money we had in our checking account, and the fact that we had our wills drafted but not signed,” she said. “I didn’t know whether I was going to be able to float a family by myself.”

In the many months of suffering after Mr. Hernando’s death in July 2009, she beat herself up while spending dozens of hours excavating their financial life and slowly reassembling it. But then, she resolved to keep anyone she knew from ever again being in the same situation.

The result is a Web site named for the scolding, profane exhortation that her inner voice shouted during those dark days in the intensive care unit. She might have called it Getyouracttogether.org, but she changed just one word.

The site offers some basic financial advice, gives away free templates for a master checklist and provides starter forms to draft a will, living will and power of attorney. There’s also a guide to starting a list of all of the accounts in your life that someone might need to access and shut down in your absence.

Read more HERE

------------------------------------------

The Law Offices of Jeremy W. Howe, LTD. are ElderLaw attorneys in Rhode Island who specialize in wills and trusts, estate planning, guardianship, probate, and Veterans Aid and Attendance Benefits.

They also are Newport Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers, Attorneys, Mediators, and Arbitrators providing services for family law issues such as divorce, child custody and visitation, support, and military family law.

Call them today at 401-841-5700 or visit them on the web at http://www.CounselFirst.com.

Surviving Spouse May Be Liable for Elder Care Expenses

Mass. Court Rules Wife Is Responsible For Husband's Nursing Home Care

Spouses need to be very careful or they could end up legally responsible for the cost of their husband’s of wife's nursing home care, as a recent Massachusetts court decision demonstrates.

When Milfranciu Jode entered a nursing home, his wife applied for Medicaid on his behalf.  Mr. Jode was rejected three times due to the failure to provide backup documentation, and he died leaving the nursing home unpaid.

After Mr. Jode's death, the nursing home sued Mrs. Jode, arguing that she was legally responsible for the cost of her husband's care under something called the "doctrine of necessaries." This means that a spouse is responsible for debts incurred by the other spouse for "necessaries." The law doesn't define what constitutes a "necessary," but in the Jode case the Massachusetts Superior Court ruled that the definition of necessaries included the care provided by the nursing home.  Emerson Village, LLC. v. Jode (Mass. Sup. Ct., Middlesex, No. 12-CV-1736-F, Dec. 15, 2012)

Many other states have similar laws to the one in Massachusetts making one spouse responsible for the care of the other spouse. If your spouse is in a nursing home, contact your elder law attorney right away to find out the best course of action to prevent any surprises when it comes to the bill.


------------------------------------------

The Law Offices of Jeremy W. Howe, LTD. are ElderLaw attorneys in Rhode Island who specialize in wills and trusts, estate planning, guardianship, probate, and Veterans Aid and Attendance Benefits.

They also are Newport Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers, Attorneys, Mediators, and Arbitrators providing services for family law issues such as divorce, child custody and visitation, support, and military family law.

Call them today at 401-841-5700 or visit them on the web at http://www.CounselFirst.com.

Asset Protection Seminars Are Not All the Same

Beware Of Asset Protection Scams

Recently, a friend attended a seminar on asset protection.  Based on information that my friend provided to me, the seminar seemed to be what has become a disturbing trend.

To be certain, asset protection is an important discipline within the field of wealth management.  Asset protection might also be called risk management.  As one might imagine, there are a number of ways to implement asset protection/risk management.  And, it is not uncommon for asset protection/risk management issues to intertwine with other disciplines, such as estate planning and tax planning.

So, how might a seminar on asset protection be a scam?  Perhaps you have heard the saying: if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.  What typically occurs in one of these seminars is that the presenter whips up fear about gold-diggers filing frivolous lawsuits attempting to get at your hard-earned money.  Typically, the presenter’s solution is not an interdisciplinary approach to an individual’s circumstances.  Instead, the presenter’s solution seems to always lead to a family limited partnership, a Nevada “secret” company, or an asset protection trust in a favorable jurisdiction . . . which is what the presenter specializes in.  And, whatever the solution is, it is cloaked in an aura of “only the elite know about this.”

In reality, the specific way that asset protection/risk management should be implemented for any person will be wholly dependent on that person’s specific objectives and circumstances.  The solution should attempt to integrate asset protection/risk management issues, estate planning issues, tax planning issues, etc.  You should question anyone who doesn’t do this.

One key question about asset protection/risk management planning is about the cost of implementation.  A particular approach might provide you with a “bullet-proof” solution.  (Keep in mind that there are always trade-offs and limits to any approach.)  But, what does it cost to implement and what does it cost to maintain?  One popular approach that is pushed at asset protection seminars is a foreign asset protection trust.  Such trusts – if done correctly – can easily run $20,000 or more simply to establish . . . never mind the annual expense to maintain.  (Key point: if done correctly.)

Now, let’s consider another approach to asset protection/risk management that has been around for hundreds of years: insurance.  As a point of disclosure, neither my firm nor I sell insurance nor are we licensed to sell insurance.

According to one source, the net worth threshold to enter into the top 1 percent of wealth in the U.S. is about $1.5 million.  Let’s round this up to $2 million.  The annual cost of a $2 million umbrella insurance policy will vary from provider to provider but will be in the range of about $300 to $400.  That is a pretty inexpensive asset protection plan compared to the annual cost to maintain a structure proposed by these presenters.

While I don’t have a source, for the sake of argument, let’s just say that the top one-half percent wealth threshold is $5M.   The annual cost of a $5 million umbrella insurance policy should run about $600 to $700.   If we extend the coverage to a $10 million umbrella insurance policy, the annual expense might reasonably be $1000 to $1200.

Think about it: for 99 percent of the general population, insurance is a fairly low-cost solution for asset protection/risk management.  In all fairness, insurance has its own limitations.  However, insurance can be combined with existing estate, tax, and business planning to yield a respectable asset protection plan.  Don’t be led to believe that one presenter’s solution is “the” way to meet your needs.

Here are some final thoughts.  Hiding assets is not a valid asset protection strategy.  If you have a judgment against you and you fail to disclose ownership of assets, you might be found in contempt.  Hiding assets is not a valid tax reduction strategy.  If you hide assets and fail to report income from those assets, you might be found guilty of tax evasion.  Do things right and do things smart.

------------------------------------------

The Law Offices of Jeremy W. Howe, LTD. are ElderLaw attorneys in Rhode Island who specialize in wills and trusts, estate planning, guardianship, probate, and Veterans Aid and Attendance Benefits.

They also are Newport Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers, Attorneys, Mediators, and Arbitrators providing services for family law issues such as divorce, child custody and visitation, support, and military family law.

Call them today at 401-841-5700 or visit them on the web at http://www.CounselFirst.com.